Thank you for smoking (2005)

Nick Naylor is a man who loves his job and doesn’t care who
knows it. Nick is the Tobacco lobby’s top spokesperson in Washington and even
though he is completely aware of the harm he is doing, he is perfectly willing
to carry on cheerfully in order to “pay the mortgage”.
Nick desperately wants to build a relationship with his son,
in spite of his ex-wife’s hostility to his job and it’s only when his son
manages to use Nicks lobbying skill to convince his mother to allow him to go on
a business trip with him that we see a softer side to the supposedly
hard-hearted face of Big Tobacco. As the
film progresses, Nick is double-crossed by a journalist and invited to testify
in front of the Senate before finally leaving tobacco and lobbying for less
toxic clients.
What kind of person would consciously and voluntarily make
themselves so hated by the general population at large? Another question would
be why would the general population hate someone just because of their chosen career?
We make assumptions about people because of their job which surely can’t stand
up. What if Nick left tobacco and worked as a lobbyist for a charity? He would
not have changed but our perception of him would have.
All references come from IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427944/?ref_=nv_sr_1
Click here to buy Thank you for smoking: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Thank-You-Smoking-Aaron-Eckhart/dp/B000KF0WKS/ref=sr_1_1?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1394803733&sr=1-1&keywords=thank+you+for+smoking
No comments:
Post a Comment